Cultural Differences

I love Chicago.

Interesting conversation with a man from Vietnam yesterday. We were discussing various SE Asian atrocities committed by oppressive governments. I offered the obvious cliche about people in this country not understanding or appreciating the freedoms we have.

His response was that he thinks we have too much freedom and thinks we need a bit of oppression. People under repressive regimes who do not break the rules are usually safer than most Americans. Oppression that you surrender to is not such a bad thing!

I asked him which freedoms he would take away. He instantly responded: the right to bear arms and the right to slander the sitting president.

Interesting viewpoint. If course, we were having this conversation in Chicago, not Saigon.

Holocaust

I have received one of those chain letters that drive me crazy.  Usually I just delete them, but this one got to me.  It starts out praising Eisenhower for ordering photos of Holocaust survivors and then it claims that England is about to take the Holocaust out of it's school curriculum to avoid offending Muslims.  

I agree that the holocaust should never be forgotten.  This misleading mass chain letter, however, is full of inaccuracies.  Here's one of many links I found de-bunking it.

http://www.hoax-slayer.com/uk-holocaust-removal.shtml

But I suspected it was nuts before I started checking into it.

First of all, the British people themselves suffered deeply during WWII and remain extremely proud of their resistance to Hitler.  They are not going to forget it any time soon.  Additionally, they are still dealing with the emotional scars that resistance caused.  We are more likely to forget it than they are.  

Secondly, this letter conveniently leaves out the millions of powerless people: homosexuals and people with disabilities and other "non-Aryan" qualities, who were also victims of the holocaust. This makes me suspicious that there is an unexpressed agenda here.  Was it okay for Hitler to experiment on them?  Or is it still okay to hate them?  

Thirdly, why would Muslims find Hitler's regime offensive?  The extremist Muslims we are worried about hate Jews more than Hitler did and have more justification.  (I do not advocate jihad, pogrom, holocaust or other forms of feuding.  I'm just saying that the on-going conflict between Israel and the Muslim world is not creating mutual understanding and respect.)  I personally think the whole point of this letter is in the last line where it warns that 9/11 will soon be forgotten because Muslims find it offensive.  Which makes this a not very subtle attack on Muslims.  Is it okay to experiment on Muslims and put them in camps?  If the people in those initial photos were wearing burkas would those photos be just as offensive?  

There is so much anti-muslim propaganda in our world today that it is very difficult to listen to reason.  We only hear about the crazy people.  Who wants to be judged by the crazy people?  As a Catholic, I certainly don't want to be judged by the Inquisition or the tiny number of sick priests.  Religion is a very tricky thing.  

Finally, Ike is famous for many things, not least of which was his warning about the dangers of the "Military Industrial (Congressional) Complex" in his farewell address.  (His original draft said "Military Industrial Congressional Complex" but he struck Congressional out.  His daughter has said it was because he thought it was counter productive to offend Congress.)  Fear and inaccuracies only give that dangerous alliance more power.  The relevant portion of his speech is found here: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY

"Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together."

Alert and knowledgeable.  I would add compassionate.  This letter fuels fear of Muslims and supports the Military Industrial Congressional wars against people who do not even have indoor plumbing.  I am in favor of security AND liberty for everyone.  Unfortunately, there is a balance.  Ultimate security can only be found by giving up liberty.  Give up too much liberty and you once again start to lose even security.  I worry that in this country we are letting our fears talk us into surrendering liberty for a false sense of security.  To a large degree, we have surrendered our ability to think rationally to our fears.  We have given our power to the Military Industrial Congressional Complex just as Ike worried we would.  He was a very thoughtful man and I suspect he would be very unhappy to have his reputation attached to this letter.  By fueling our fears of Muslims, this letter empowers the very people Ike warned us about.

Too often these mass mailings I receive do not seem knowledgeable, compassionate or even alert - they just seem ill-informed and scared.  They remind me of Beatrice in "Much Ado About Nothing":  "He is now as valiant as Hercules who only tells a lie and swears by it."  

Daughter of a scientist here.  My motto is "Check it out."  I will not forward anything on until I have checked it out.  If I do not have time to check something out or if I am not particularly interested in the subject, I just delete it.  This particular one, since it deals with and encourages hate and fear, upset me more than most.  So I decided to respond.

Tax the Rich

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama says he's not engaging in "class warfare" -- he's just doing the math. But House Speaker John Boehner (BAY'-nur) says class warfare is exactly what Obama is engaging in -- and he says that's not the same as leadership. (End Quote)


President Obama promised to veto any budget plan that cuts Medicare without closing loopholes which create tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.  Speaker Boehner said, "Tax the rich, tax the rich.  That's really not the American way."  Then he went on to say that balancing the budget requires more people on the tax roles, more jobs.


So let's think about this.  What we need is more people working at Wal-Mart, earning less than a living wage and paying higher taxes.  We need more elderly going without medical care because they can't afford it.  We need to keep giving the wealthiest people "incentives" to get richer because "they deserve a break today."  We need to crush unions and collective bargaining because it's all those teachers and fire fighters and police officers being greedy that actually is behind the deficit.  That's the way the Sherriff of Nottingham reasoned and why Robin Hood is still a popular folk hero!


Yet it's President Obama that is accused of "class warfare" and not people like Boehner and the Tea Party?  


I think the "Trickle Down Theory" hasn't actually worked.  Nothing ever "trickles down".   It hasn't worked in the recent past.  It didn't work in the days of Rockefeller.  But speaking of Rockefeller and the Robber Barons, maybe Boehner has a point.  Maybe class oppression IS the American way, it's just not what I learned America was about when I was in grade school.    

Can someone PLEASE explain?

Here's what I keep hearing on the radio (and reading in Time magazine!)

1% of the people hold 90% of the wealth.  Why should I support tax cuts for them?

 Our primary and secondary schools keep lagging further and further behind the rest of the world.  Why are we cutting back on education?

5% of the world population lives in this country and we consume 75% of the medicine and we pay much, much more for health care.  Okay, so why are we only 37th as far as quality of healthcare?  And why is the GOP intent of repealing health care reform?

The Social Security program has been paying its way and has enough surplus to continue doing so for at least 27 more years.  Why does it get mentioned every time someone is talking about the deficit?

It seems to me that the gap between the wealthy and the poor is getting larger and the real struggle is not between the political parties - liberal vs conservative - it is (or should  be) a struggle between whether we want to live in a democracy or return to the dark ages!  Not only the money, but the power is all getting pooled into the hands of the very wealthy and the rest of us are carefully controlled so that we keep on arguing amongst ourselves while everything is taken away from us.  We should not be arguing about the rights of minorities or immigrants or GLTBs.  We should embrace equality and work together to make sure we don't become scapegoats and serfs!

Mid Term Elections

I'm not really sure of the origins of the myth that Republicans are more religious (spiritual) and less corrupt than Democrats.  Watergate.  Do I need to say more?  Because anyone who is paying attention knows that there are seedy, corrupt and irreligious people on either camp.  It's the nature of politics, I am afraid.  There are really good guys on both sides as well.  People are, in the final analysis, just people.

I'm in favor of ending corruption and I don't mind tax cuts, but my family and I belong to several "Special Interest Groups" and I'm afraid we have just become expendable.  People with disabilities, public school teachers, home healthcare workers and (Please God) we are about to become members of the "Special Interest Group" called Cancer Survivors - we are some of the people that make considerably less than President O'Bama's often referenced $250,000 a year cut off.  (I guess if you make more than $250K you are in the "wealthy" camp.)  We are the people who need affordable healthcare without pre-existing condition clauses or penalties and a roof over our heads and food on the table.

People don't become wealthy on merit.  They become wealthy because of luck.  For every "self-made" billionaire, there are about a billion others who work as hard, are just as smart and are teachers or musicians or factory workers.  On top of that, there is the added factor of class.  If you are born into a family that has wealth and it is assumed that you will go to college, you will probably wind up making more money than someone else whose family has different expectations.  That also has nothing to do with merit.  This has been true since Mark Twain wrote "Puddin' Head Wilson" and probably true since the feudal system gave way to the market-based economy.  I heard a guy on TV say that birth order has a lot to do with whether or not you succeed.  There are so MANY factors.  Very little of financial success has to do with personal merit.  This is why I believe wealth and privilege SHOULD also include responsibility.  Wealthy people owe a debt of gratitude to the culture that allowed them to become wealthy.

Well, I think everyone should feel gratitude and responsibility toward their community.

Illinois has one of the highest per capita incomes and one of the highest tax rates and yet we do not have enough money to support schools, fire fighters, police officers, bus drivers, etc.  We do not have enough money to give everyone with a disability aid.  It is handed out grudgingly by a kind of lottery system and mostly on an emergency basis.

A government which balances it's budget on the backs of the most helpless and the least funded has lost all credibility and can no longer claim to be "democratic" or "humane" or "of the people".  I didn't know how to vote this year.  The Republican agenda seems to be to cut back on services to people like us, so why would I vote for them?  And yet, the Democrats promise to fight for our needs, but seem to be impotent.

I'm not that confident that John Boehner and his other Republican politicians really hear my voice any more than the Democrats.  Do they know people like us even exist?

Governor

On the front page of the Trib recently there was an article on how many children with disabilities have died in state homes because of poor oversight, understaffing and neglect.  Complete with pictures of the deceased.  They were adorable.

On the SAME PAGE they had an announcement that the Trib is endorsing Brady for governor.  This is the same guy that will CUT funding to these institutions.

I'm just saying...

My Take on Sara Palin

As the mother of a son with profound disabilities, I was initially thrilled to hear a woman say she, as a fellow mother with a child with disabilities, would be my advocate in Washington. The world needs people like us in power. There would be less war and more compassion. I am a firm believer in all mothers who work. Mothers and fathers of children with disabilities have already made a huge difference in the world. They have not only fought long and hard to make things better for their children and for the rest of the population of people with disabilities, they have worked to make this a more just and humane world for all of us.

But the next day I saw a picture of her with her baby on a magazine cover and started to have doubts. This child is an infant! Governor Palin has more experience in Foreign Policy than she has as the mother of a child with disabilities. Her foreign policy experience is based on trade negotiations with her two closest neighbors, Canada and Russia. And she's been doing that for several months longer than she has been the mother of a child with Down's Syndrome!

I would be a lot happier if this child were older and I knew this family had successfully faced the challenges that are clearly on the horizon for them.

My concern is more than "Walk the Walk before you Talk the Talk." The first three years of being a parent of a child with disabilities are hell. Parents and siblings have to come to terms with the profound way in which the core of their lives will change. There is a deep grieving process that must occur if the family is going to come to a place of acceptance and move forward into a very different future successfully. There are an endless stream of questions that must be answered, doctors and physical therapists and other specialists to be consulted. Children with Down's Syndrome often have medical issues that need to be addressed in the first few years. There is also the problem of dealing with the confusing issues of aid. How much financial assistance will the family require and is it available? What kind of in-home assistance will be needed for the extra care required? There is a seemingly endless stream of helpful people who suddenly think
they have the right to invade your private life whether you have invited them in or not.

It sounds like Gov. Palin has a very supportive husband who will have to become the primary caregiver and advocate for their child. But even though I took on that role for our son, I would have been lost if I hadn't had my husband close by to support me and co-parent. I can't imagine how Mr. Palin will manage if his partner is on the other side of the continent!

There is rage, confusion, sorrow and guilt to be faced and every day seems to bring a new insurmountable problem. Many marriages do not survive this initial period. Many careers are lost simply because the stress from home is too great. Someone who has already dealt successfully with this process might very well be transformed into a person who could change the world.

There are many women I would like to see in Washington. I think, after tackling the difficult journey of becoming the mother of a child with disabilities, Sara Palin might someday become one of them. But right now, I think it is really too bad she didn't blink.